Celtic Transfer Rumours

Post Celtic rumours

Rangers Sevco Posts

05 Feb 2015 13:43:09
here ed see if aw the forein Geordie guys don't hit it aff it the aw new sports direct stores (openin soon!)it the broomie rd ootlit,
kin they take thum back tae mick arseli, s hoose?
like a dun when a went fae low moss oan day release last week & pretty much emtit the place (sports direct Strathkelvin retail perk "fur aw yur knockin needs" incidentally a goat a very nice "his n his matchin shellsoot wae wee sperklin things oan, ideal fur the wee isis wean thit is aboot tae get baptised next seturday it posso rejistray office< (aw welcum bye the waey!)
anyway I digest!
so a stole aw this gear fae micky A's shoap oan the Tuesday then laid low in laidlow moss then took thum aw back fur a refund jist afore the dye hid run oan thum the next week when a wiz oot oan a "visit tae ma terminally ill maw who hid died 6 year ago wae the clap,
anyhow I digest agane ed,
see when atook thum back the wee nyaff behind the counter sade,
"am sorry sur bit wee canae gie ye a refund oan the gear bit kin gie ye a credit note fur the ammoont so ye kin huv yur pick ae the store fur £12, 345.99!
so fuk it a sade tae ma 7 escorts staunin aside me,
so am noo the proud ownur ae "the indirect sports .co-op.youkay Strathy perk bisshy!!!!,
bit keep sthtum ed because a don't want Kenny mcdome pullin his hare oot tryin tae dae the same.
so aws well thit sterts well eh edsky.
ps, ah nevur made it tae ma wee maws deathbed bit me n the 7 dwarfs fae lowmoss your daen a roarin trade it the new shoap bit don't tell wee timbo heel only want a cut the wee nyaff!
pps shood huv seen the rush we hid in the shoap roon aboot 4 ocloak sunday efturnin lookin fur refunds here ye coodnae make it up ed am tellin ye
god bless me,
wee vera looks a fkn treat in hur new cricket bawboax, ed foties tae folae
pppps it keeps the smell in tae edo,
goat tae go iz the actin governors comin back fae " quinns" it the cross,

wee pat

(0)
(11)

Ed: any chance you can put up subtitles with this post.
lol

cprs1 cprs1

(1)
(1)

 

 

03 Feb 2015 18:29:48
I watched the game at 5am in the morning due to bring in usa for few weeks. The singing from the new club fans was offensive sectarianism and the bbc have video evidence of the singing. Complaints should be made to the bbc and footballing authorities and the match commander should be reporting this behaviour just like they did when it was alleged that CFC fans had at European match. The newco supporter I watched it with asked how do you stop it. Make them play behind closed doors. Make the club vicariously responsible and either stop or you'll be closed down. After sll it wouldn't take much to put them out of business and the vile songs would be punished.

Stu88

(7)
(15)

 

 

02 Feb 2015 19:53:54
I see there is to be probe into the sectarian shame from both sets of supporters at yesterday's match. Was I maybe watching a different game. I defo heard the sash, the billy Boys the famine song. Why is it always old firm shame and not called as it is. This has wound me up tonight. We had there entire back catalogue yesterday and we are being dragged into this old firm shame nonsense again. Just like when Alan mcgregor was arrested it was an old firm player, it was the old firm shame game when they totally lost the plot and had 3 men sent off and diouff was trying to fight with stewards and lenny waved a finger at alistair how dare he. Sorry for the rant guys but our fans were impeccable yesterday and we are drawn into this bile old firm sectarian nonsense again

Garybhoy1888

(13)
(17)

 

 

31 Jan 2015 20:08:11
Black won't play!wow paranoia is back

Ryan!!!!

(2)
(12)

 

 

28 Jan 2015 16:55:56
Tom Boyd - Tells it like it is. Well done Tom.
An aside, I have no time for reputedly Celtic fans who visit the Sevco site under the banner, Celtic Fan in Peace, then spout some ingratiating tosh.
If I ever did post there it would be with full war paint on and I would not be passing round a peace pipe.

Celticflame

(20)
(33)

This site used to have some great wind up merchants who would give them pelters regularly. I can't understand this in peace crap myself.

green jhedi

(5)
(11)

GJ since their ED039 took over you cannot get a wind up posted, god knows I have tried he has no sense of what a banter site is for. At lease ED001 still allows gentle wind ups now and then.

Timalloy

(0)
(10)

Yeah ed001 is pretty good actually as he isn't a Rangers man and obviously has a sense of humour! The Celtic forum is lucky to have Ed007 with ed001 guesting every so often!

007 just cracks me up, I love coming on this forum just to read his comebacks lol cheers ed!

Matelot Matelot

(1)
(7)

 

 

26 Jan 2015 21:04:48
Seen some of that footage from Ricksen charity match.

Heart sank, couldn't believe what I was seeing. Rivalry aside I really do wish him and his family well. Hope something positive in terms of treatment becomes available to improve his life.

Kev T   Kev T
(29)
(8)

 

 

26 Jan 2015 19:10:58
I really find it hard to believe some of us getting our panties in a bunch over an advertisement that does nothing but state the bleedin obvious. Why are you not outraged over the fact we have to do things like this to gain any sort of parity in the corrupt association we are stuck with?

The revisionism that has taken place since rangers entered liquidation, a position the club are still in remember, is astonishing.Where is your pride that we never had do do such a thing? This is the ultimate victory over our rivals, we buried them while they were chasing Minties moonbeams. Revel in it and never let them forget.Honestly I am expecting complaints from the Asthmatic CSC claiming it is leaving them breathless!

green jhedi

(9)
(20)

I find it really hard to believe that some of us got our panties in such a twist, that they felt that they had to spend real money (how much?), to take out an advert that was stating the bleeding obvious, what was the point of it?.

aindoh

(2)
(22)

There is a poll today and some 78% are against the ad when I checked it and it amazes me as to why so many are willing to accept the continuing farce of lies and denial that this country has advocated at every opportunity.
I know that a lie is still a lie no matter how many times it's told, but there must be some sort of right of reply and it should have been spearheaded from Celtic Park at the outset.

JungleJim

(1)
(19)

Thats what gets me, a lie is a lie is a lie, everyone knows it, why do you want to give it credence by arguing against it, is like someone saying back is white, and your sayin no, black is black, I mean what's the point of arguing against them, they will believe forever that rangers came out of administration and that they are still the same team, liquidation is the only word you need to use when they disagree, just worry about celtic forget about rangers, they are still the same team in every loyal supporters heart, but why worry about them, the vast majority of good decent old rangers supporters understand what happened, the only ones getting annoyed on the celtic side, are the equivalent bampots.

aindoh

(3)
(14)

JungleJim, being against the ad does not mean you agree that the new lot are the old lot. However, I am a Celtic supporter and I do resent anyone publishing statements which are supposed to represent the 'supporters.' I did not get the option to review or comment on it before it was published. I also could care less on what the undead want to think and regardless of anything else, it makes not one bit of difference to my life, career or support for Celtic what they want to call themselves. I do not get upset and frustrated because of their thoughts. I know what I think based on the facts and if SFA or anyone else wishes to say different then so be it. I understand they are looking at revenue and everything associated with the old firm and that means more to them than integrity. Does anyone on our side think that if the bunnet had not stepped in and we had gone down the tubes they would have accepted that we were a new club? I would take the same stance. Its Celtic and that's it. bit of a rant but I guess the bottom line is I don't care what they do unless its illegal, affects me personally or my club in general. Hail Hail (illigitimi non tatum carrborundum)

TinyTim TinyTim

(0)
(5)

 

 

26 Jan 2015 15:58:33
Reguarding a thread today, found this intresting article.

"The club and company are separate."

No, they are not.

When a club, any club, incorporates, it becomes a company. There is no club any more. It may still be referred to as, "the club, " but it is now a company, indistinguishable in Scots law from its corporate identity.

"But Lord Nimmo Smith said Rangers FC continues to exist."

Not really.

LNS' Reasons for Decision dated 12th September 2012, had a specific purpose. He was clarifying the definition of "football club, " for the purposes of the SPL investigation into Rangers' use of dual contracts. LNS effectively explained why Sevco Scotland had an interest in the proceedings and a right to representation.

What LNS was not doing, was ruling whether or not in Scots law Rangers FC (1872) still existed.

Everyone remembers LNS stated:

"In common speech a Club is treated as a recognisable entity which is capable of being owned and operated, and which continues in existence despite its transfer to another owner and operator. In legal terms, it appears to us to be no different from any other undertaking which is capable of being carried on, bought and sold."

What is not recalled so often is that LNS went on:

"This is not to say that a Club has legal personality, separate from and additional to the legal personality of its owner and operator. We are satisfied that it does not, and Mr McKenzie did not seek to argue otherwise. So a Club cannot, lacking legal personality, enter into a contract by itself."

As we all know, UEFA define clubs as, "legal entities, " so while "Rangers FC" was a football club for the purposes of the SPL investigation, it is not a football club as defined by UEFA.

"Rangers' membership of the SFA was transferred to newco. It's not a new membership, so we're still the same club."

No.

Rangers FC was founded in 1872, the year before the SFA was formed. Rangers FC was a football club before the SFA existed, therefore membership of the SFA does not make Rangers FC a football club. Nor does it make them the same club as previously held the membership.

Also, as far as can be ascertained, SFA member clubs are not issued with membership numbers. How then can we be sure that Rangers (2012) even do hold the same membership as the old club?

And how about this - when Rangers played Brechin in August last year, they did so on a, "conditional membership" of the SFA, while the old club still held their membership!

So there was a point in time in August last year when there were simultaneously TWO legal entities with SFA memberships, calling themselves "Rangers."

In fact, the Rangers that played Brechin in August had not been allowed by the SFA to play in any pre-season friendly matches because they did not hold a membership, while a different "Rangers" was a member.

So how can the current Rangers possibly be the same club as the one founded in 1872, when they were simultaneously members of the SFA?

"The SFA, UEFA, ECA, ASA all recognise us as the same club."

This one is a real mess and as usual, the responsibility lies with the SFA.

The SFA has in fact never stated that Rangers (1872) continues. Through a mixture of cowardice, pragmatism and reluctance, the SFA has officially stated precisely nothing publicly with regards to the new club/same club issue.

What the SFA has done, through inaction, is allow the same club myth to grow.

UEFA likewise, have stated nothing publicly with regards to the new club/same club issue. An indication of how UEFA are likely to regard the club currently playing at Ibrox is their treatment of Derry City.

Derry City entered liquidation in 2009, and a new club was formed from the ashes. In 2012, the new Derry City qualified for the Europa League, but was refused a place by UEFA, on the grounds that they had not been members of the FAI for three consecutive years.

This year, Derry City have again qualified for the preliminary rounds of the Europa League, but have not been credited with the coefficient points of the old club, despite their still appearing on the coefficient table.

It seems clear that while UEFA will state nothing publicly about Rangers, UEFA will apply Article 12 of the FFP regulations if and when they qualify for Europe.

The European Club Association's position as regards Rangers was informed by the SFA. The ECA were told by the SFA that Rangers had been demoted to the Third Division, which is quite clearly inaccurate.

On the basis of inaccurate information supplied by the SFA, the ECA then voted Rangers Football Club plc out of their organisation, and voted The Rangers Football Club Ltd in, as an associate member.

Whatever the ECA's position on Rangers, they are not a football governing body.

The Advertising Standards Association recently decided it was allowable for Rangers to claim to be, "Scotland's most successful football club."

It turns out though that their investigation was less than thorough, amounting to asking Rangers if they were in fact the same club. On receiving a, "yes, " the ASA decided that the case was closed.
However, the ruling is now the subject of an appeal and one would hope a proper investigation is made this time.

Again though, the ASA is not a football governing body.

"Sevco Scotland bought the club from Duff & Phelps."
I'm afraid not.

In every document they issued as administrators of Rangers, Duff & Phelps routinely defined Rangers as "'the company' and 'the club.'"

Nowhere in the asset purchase is "Rangers FC" or "the club" listed as amongst the assets sold to Sevco Scotland, or Sevco 5088.

Duff & Phelps sold Ibrox Stadium, Murray Park, the lease on the Albion carpark and Rangers' trademarks to Sevco Scotland.

Sevco Scotland did not purchase as single share in The Rangers Football Club plc, the entity formed in 1872 and incorporated in 1899.

"Ah, but Sevco Scotland bought Rangers' history along with the assets."

We are now into the realms of comedy.

History simply cannot be bought.

"A football club is the stadium, players and fans. It's still a club called 'Rangers' playing in the same stadium, same strips and in front of the same fans."

Can we refer to this as "the Kit-Kat theory?"

This is a sentimental, almost romantic view of the meaning of "football club." Let's think though - did Southampton become a new club when they left The Dell and moved to St Mary's?

Did Cardiff City become a new club when they changed their colours from blue to red?

Is there a club anywhere in the world more than 100 years old, still playing in front of the same fans as when they were founded?

We cannot avoid returning to the salient point here - football clubs are legal entities responsible for football teams.

No matter what imaginative mental contortions Rangers fans come up with to justify their claim that their club was formed in 1872, just concentrate on that one, single point.

A football club is a legal entity responsible for the running of a football team.

If "Rangers FC" is a separate entity from The Rangers Football Club Ltd, it can exist only in the ethereal realm of the collective Rangers consciousness.

Sevco Scotland's "Rangers FC, " can never qualify for a UEFA license for the following reasons related to Article 12 of the FFP regulations:

1) It is not a legal entity responsible for the running of a football team
2) As it is not a legal entity, it is not, and can never be, a member of a national association.
3) As it is not a legal entity, it does not have, and never can have, a contractual relationship with a member of a national association

The legal entity responsible for the running of a football team out of Ibrox Stadium is The Rangers Football Club Ltd (formerly Sevco Scotland).

The member of the Scottish Football Association currently operating out of Ibrox Stadium is The Rangers Football Club Ltd (formerly Sevco Scotland), formed in 2012.

The member of the Scottish Football Association currently operating out of Ibrox Stadium has, and can have, no contractual relationship with the ethereal "Rangers Football Club" its fans claim to support because lacking legal form, it cannot enter into a contractual relationship.

In two years' time, The Rangers Football Club Ltd will meet the criteria for a UEFA Club License. UEFA will not be able to "recognise" it as a club formed in 1872, because the legal entity that is the football club playing out of Ibrox was formed only in 2012.

I'm sure we can all agree that there are no problems with The Rangers Football Club Ltd positioning itself as the successor club of the 140 year old club that slipped into liquidation in 2012.

There can be no possible objections to their fans taking whatever pleasure they can from the numerous titles and cups won by the old club.

What we cannot accept though, is a one year old club claiming titles and trophies won in the Victorian era as their own.

What must be remembered though is that The Rangers Football Club Ltd is not the real villain of this piece.

The real villain is the Scottish Football Association, which feeds and nurtures the same club myth with its public silence and private misinformation to anyone who asks if The Rangers Football Club Ltd as the owners of a football club founded in 1872.

It's time to end the deception!

DaBhoyBhoy

(20)
(21)

 

 

23 Jan 2015 06:11:52
Another crook exposed from the dark side. After all the publicity surrounding the last betting scandal, this person places bets regardless. There should be no suspended sentence (unless it involves a rope and chair - joking Ed!) But seriously, the last scandal was well publicised, the punishment well publicised and, as far as I know, the Footballers Union sent a rep around the clubs to spell the law out to the players. No excuses or defence if the player placed bets. (More to the point, why place bets in your own name in the first place? Surely best mate, family or similar could place the bet?)

TinyTim   TinyTim
(6)
(28)

 

 

21 Jan 2015 20:35:22
Is it true that the ref for the Celtic v The Rangers game Bobby Madden a former season ticket holder for the zombies? Tonight will be an insight into what to expect I bet he gives us nothing

bravetart86

(1)
(34)

 

 

20 Jan 2015 19:15:03
C sly sports interviewer Jim White gives
Charlie Green an easy interview.
No hard questions asked.
According to Ed039, Jim White being a bluenose is a myth. ( Ah an sevco aren't cheating crooks )
Hail Hail
DBB

DaBhoyBhoy

(1)
(13)

Remember his Laudrop interview
"Oh Brian why are you so good" as he stuck his tongue in a private part of Laudrop lol

Timalloy

(4)
(16)

But it was funny though lol

tony2bhoy

(1)
(13)

 

 

20 Jan 2015 11:10:50
Right, I've tried calling this McCoist Tae dae a wee bit gardening for me he said he couldnay manage. I said I know, but whit about the garden? and he hung up! Is that any way Tae run a business?

TinyTim   TinyTim
(9)
(24)

1 x Disagree - whits that aboot? It wis a wee bit humour and you disagree? Disagree with what? Any way tae run a business or what?

TinyTim TinyTim

(1)
(22)

Ah better not even mention that Sally's Business is expanding and he will be taking on an assistant soon.

TinyTim TinyTim

(1)
(22)

Some people wid jist disagree if ye telt them the sun wis bigger than the moon (ah don't mean the newspaper, by re way)

TinyTim TinyTim

(0)
(19)

 

 

18 Jan 2015 09:13:28
Watching sevco - Hearts game on tv, lmao when I seen two zombies holding up a banner with, " NOT-A-PENNY-MORE" on it.
This was inside the ground, M Ashley must be quacking in his boots against these hard line protests.

wonder if they`ll bring the banner back to the replay?

BennyBhoy

(8)
(16)

 

 

17 Jan 2015 18:22:36
Re Dallas coin game.(Sorry to go back to an earlier point)

Given the bile were more than happy to implode within their own buildings and onto the streets last night.
Who gets billed for the Police Helicopter/ mounted cops & fire services, because they are unhappy with their board?

It now concerns me even more for the forthcoming game.

Batten down the hatches when they get pumped, all hell will break loose.

HH

cprs1   cprs1
(7)
(16)

 

 

14 Jan 2015 23:00:59
Just to add to the earlier post re our semi final opponents. The best way I heard them described was 'different sh!te. Same flies'! That's why I can't wait to give them a doing!

Briggs

(10)
(21)

 

 

14 Jan 2015 22:07:46
Please tell me that's a wind up on the Sevco site from someone claiming to be a Celtic fan wishing them all the best for Feb 1st 😂😂😂

DEEAITCH

(6)
(14)

 

 

11 Jan 2015 20:36:17
The rumoured advert CFC supporters will be putting in the press before the League Cup against the football club playing out of Ibrox.

Ed007   Ed007
(11)
(16)

Don't see anything Ed, is there a link?

TinyTim TinyTim

Ed07{Ed007's Note - Try clicking here. I don't know why you can't see it.}

(0)
(10)

Congratulations to whoever wrote this, it is spot on.
I wonder if the press will publish it.

gerryc

(2)
(11)

Well pleased about this article and looking forward to seeing it in the Sunday Herald.

Bankie Bhoy Bankie Bhoy

(2)
(11)

 

 

10 Jan 2015 09:37:57
Hearing reports that the newco could be the deadco within 72 hours!?anyone know how this is even possible!?whats so significant about Monday all of a sudden?its laughable really however I don't think it will happen!whats your thoughts?

Jones

(7)
(14)

I heard there were onerous contracts from Charles Green due for payment . A loan Charles had in the name of the club for buying the liguidated club plus a £1 starting up from the dead expenses .

Chris02

(6)
(9)

 

 

09 Jan 2015 21:03:55
Funny livingstone getting hammered for dual ownership. Nothing said about ashley and the living dead

half pint

Ed07{Ed007's Note - Didn't the SFA block Ashley upping his stake in the club currently playing in Ibrox?}

(9)
(4)

Surely Cambell O. Had shares in Hearts and the dearly departed club .

Chris02

(3)
(2)

 

 

07 Jan 2015 18:06:16
my thoughts are probably the same as a lot of people, in that the incumbents do not want to let go of the GRAVY train.
well the train is heading towards the station and the end of the line is nigh?

cprs1   cprs1
(3)
(7)

 

 

07 Jan 2015 15:46:42
The daily r***ers attempt at rewriting history and ignoring ra***rs demise is beyond a joke, their back page this morning reads like this " llambias was invited to attend a meeting with Neil Doncaster who demanded to know if the club may be tipped into administration two years after it was dumped ( now you tell me which ending to the paragraph makes sense), a-into liquidation or b -into an ultimately disastrous financial meltdown by former owner Craig Whyte, now no prizes for guessing which words the re**rd used . Is their no one in this country bold enough to take these people to task?

fab1

(10)
(7)

Fab 1
The Scottish media are exceptionally good at getting their facts wrong .

Chris02

(2)
(3)

 

 

06 Jan 2015 11:34:45
I wonder if the liquidators are paying attention to the latest statements from the undead. American guy offers a bunch of cash and a forward plan to gain a controlling interest and guess what? The figure does not meet their valuation of the club. So it's worth more than the £5 million Green paid then? So the death spiral continues.

TinyTim   TinyTim
(9)
(6)

Hope someone is keeping a book with all the rules that are being broken across the other side of the river. Just not now but since 2012.

toh1967

(9)
(5)

 

 

06 Jan 2015 10:40:25
This is copied and pasted ed from aner site but too good not to share ;)

THE BOUNCY BANK
Convicts, fraudsters, shameless liars, a board you can trust.
22 million raised in just one share issue and lost the lot.
67million gone in just 18 months
Their chairman then says no more emergency funding required, then surprise surprise needs EMERGENCY LOANS.
Then new share issue raises 3.13 million and disappears again
The BOUNCY bank
The bank that likes to say
IT'S GONE!
PEOPLE YOU CAN TRUST!

HH

Chris1888

chris   chris
(7)
(5)

 

 

02 Jan 2015 13:55:44
So the BBC have conducted an 'emphatic q & a' with Neil Doncaster and he has confirmed that Rangers are in fact the same club.

The zombies are loving that today. All of a sudden they agree with what he says. Funny that.

HenriksTongue

(13)
(6)

 

 

02 Jan 2015 12:10:26
Seen some fans yesterday having some kinda meltdown over Neil Doncaster's comments, saying they won't be back at Celtic or buying their merchandise etc.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30646033


I know opinions vary in football and there's no right or wrong but what is it some fans want Celtic to say?


Did they not hear Celtic at the AGM when they said they have a responsibility to players, Managers, staff and fans safety - do some folk not actually stay in Glasgow or its surrounding area? We have a semi-final game coming up and personally I think it would be unwise of Celtic to stoke the flames.


If your hatred outweighs everything else then so be it but don't give me all this corrupt carry on when you are happy queuing all the way up to Parkhead Cross giving money to UEFA and FIFA.

Mrs E

(9)
(7)

Mrs E the tentacles of the people hatred stretch far beyond Glasgow and surrounding area . Every time Celtic. beat that Govan mob, we know about it in very many parts of the North of Ireland .

Surely if the powers that be, had any knowledge of the difference between right and wrong, between good and evil, now that they are dieing for the second time, all life support should be removed and let the cancerous evil expire .

Chris02

(1)
(1)

 

 

01 Jan 2015 16:59:57
I see Neil Doncaster has come out and said the shame is still the same club. How is he still in a job he doesn't have a clue the leagues gone downhill since he took over with sponsorship albeit we have just received a poxy 1.75m and the secret 5 way agreement breaking all the rules he isn't exactly making Scottish football appealing when its thought very little of as it is

bravetart86

(8)
(11)

 

 

27 Dec 2014 15:49:57
ha! Oh stop it ref, blaw the whistle. If they were a horse the vet would be called in with his gun.the gift that just keeps on giving. Oh man, mah sides are hurtin. This is one of the best panto's ever.

TinyTim   TinyTim
(11)
(0)

Heard the bookmakers have made Sevco favourites for the 2020 Petrofac Cup

Timalloy

(12)
(2)

 

 

27 Dec 2014 14:38:59
Well Done Hibs!!!


The Sno Man

The Sno Man

(4)
(0)

 

 

27 Dec 2014 14:20:41
Aaaaaa

That is all

Wee1888

(2)
(0)

 

 

23 Dec 2014 20:33:45
According to reports on Sevco sites, one of teir longest standing employees a woman secretary who has been there over 43 years has been made redundant with only two and a half years severence pay, the board used the "new club syndrome" to cut her payments.
No morals at all those in charge down Govan way.

BigJockRemembered

(19)
(2)

That's a bit rich mate. Most of them are appalled by it. I'm assuming your just talking about the board, fair enough

HH_Joe

(4)
(4)

 

 

Copyright mobile.celticrumours.co.uk All Rights Reserved

.