27 Jan 2015 10:08:38
We sell every good player we have for any sniff off profit we can get, but we have rejected a 3 million pound bid for Ambrose? I have no words at all.

1.) 27 Jan 2015
27 Jan 2015 11:28:28
I can't believe you believe that!

2.) 27 Jan 2015
If this is true, all I can think of is that we don't have a replacement lined up that we could get for 1/10th of that.

3.) 27 Jan 2015
£3m is good price. Could Van Dijks agent be trying to force transfer this window and club do not want to risk losing Ambrose as well? Just thinking outside the box mate

4.) 27 Jan 2015
27 Jan 2015 13:07:26
Another paper says 1.5million , truth is its probably a silly fee in instalments

5.) 27 Jan 2015
Maybe the board are holding out for 5 to 6 million due to his recent excellent performance!

Honestly I think we are holding onto him as we all know VVD is going on the summer and there is no guarantee that Denayer will stay for another year. If Ambrose goes we will be left with a pairing of Mulgrew and O'Connell (or Lustig) for any potential European qualifiers.

6.) 27 Jan 2015
Good sum we could have got the young Dutch CB with that money and had change. We have no hope of qualifying for CL as both Denayer and Virgil will be offski in the summer and we will have to bring in CBs which at the rate we do business will be too late, We will already be out. Not enough time to forge a partnership in defence either not well thought out. Or maybe that was PL plan then it will be loans or low budget players as there is no CL

7.) 27 Jan 2015
27 Jan 2015 17:51:50
We have no cover though charlie is out for another 8 weeks we have the biggest 3 games of the season coming up and if vvd or denayer get injured there is no cb's apart from youth