30 Oct 2019 19:07:52
Morgan Hayes on the bench yet still no Sinclair He's a far better player than those 2 yet still not included. Something must have happend between him and Lennon. Is Sinclair the top earner Ed?

{Ed007's Note - Yeah, him and Brown but I've no idea how much of Forster's wages we're paying.}

1.) 30 Oct 2019
30 Oct 2019 21:45:06
As we are paying Sinclair's wages, surely we should be playimg him. £35k out the door, every week, probably bonuses as well.

2.) 31 Oct 2019
31 Oct 2019 07:26:18
I'm still struggling to figure out why we would extend Sinclair's contract in the summer if Lennon had no plans to play him.
Surely we could have just let him leave instead of taking the years option then paying him £35k a week and he can sign for someone else in Jan then sit tight until the summer.

It puts me in mind of when BR stopped the Boyata transfer and we lost out on the £8m transfer fee, I know its not the same but it will cost us nearly £2m in wages in wee Scott sits tight until the summer.

3.) 31 Oct 2019
31 Oct 2019 14:25:51
@Jonbhoy71

ye your right we extended his contract why tho
presume he had a future with us, clashing with Lenny can't see it, is there a fight in sinclair not sure about that is there a gd player there im sure there is,
ye we messed up with boyata and we lost him weeks before he left as he was injured,
surely a stronger bench and better options if he is on it.
sinclair IMO was like a headless chicken pulling out of tackles and one on ones. it was annoying as he is better than that, then he came on to his game ans scored then lenny stopped playing him but also lenny said there is no rift with him he just needs to fight for his position. thing is im not sure why he wouldn't fight as he is still young and fit and looked after himself and a gd player with goals, so lenny its your shout, as something not right there,