02 Jun 2021 09:03:45
I see this story about Ntcham being released is showing up again. Is there any truth in it? HH.

1.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 15:44:57
Hopefully!

2.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 16:12:02
The club would announce it officially if it were to happen.

3.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 16:21:44
Kev, the club don't make announcements about anything. HH.

4.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 17:16:08
Period.

5.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 18:08:12
I can understand not wantin Ntcham at park head but what's the deal with wanting him released? Are we not needing funds to rebuild? Would 1 or 2M not potentially bring in another player or cover a salary? In my eyes the club would be making yet another mistake by releasing an asset for free. Whether you value the player or not doesn't mean he doesn't have a monetary value.

6.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 18:45:13
SOS, I agree with you HH.

7.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 19:43:57
I agree you donâ€™t let an asset leave for free however say he gets wage hike in final year for instance or even on a decent Â£20k plus salary if we donâ€™t have any suitors willing to pay fee it costs us a Â£1m minimum to keep him around and if he is stinking the place out it might be wise to come to a mutual termination.
Best thing to do is wait and see what we are offered and if nothing happens during window then agree the mutual termination if heâ€™s not in new managers plans.

8.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 21:45:23
GGGG if the situation was that bad then 100% but it's not realistically going to happen. I think club's will still take a chance on him it's not like he's murdered a puppy.

9.) 02 Jun 2021
02 Jun 2021 22:02:58
Murdered a puppy pmsl mate. Thereâ€™s no doubt the boy has ability but has had his head turned.
Surely a bottom 8 EPL would want to take a chance on him and would happily pay Â£1-2m or a Porto, PSV standard of club.
With no manager in place itâ€™s inconceivable that we would allow him to leave for nothing atm.